verified_user
Standardful
首页chevron_right标准chevron_rightISO 21448:2022
有效国际标准update 最后更新:2022年6月

ISO 21448:2022

道路车辆 预期功能安全(SOTIF)

apartment发布组织:国际标准化组织 (ISO)

标准简介

ISO 21448:2022 是由 国际标准化组织 (ISO) 发布的有效标准,常用于汽车、电子产品、科技等行业,并适用于全球等市场。

本页汇总了 ISO 21448:2022 的官方文档、当前状态以及常见相关认证或评估机构,便于快速理解要求与落地路径。

psychology

Beyond Functional Safety

Addresses hazards from functional insufficiencies and reasonably foreseeable misuse — even when the system is operating correctly without malfunctions, filling the gap that ISO 26262 does not cover.

visibility

Sensor & Algorithm Limitations

Focuses on performance limitations of sensing and perception systems (cameras, radar, lidar) and decision algorithms that may cause unsafe behavior in triggering conditions.

explore

Scenario-Based Analysis

Uses scenario-based approaches to identify and evaluate triggering conditions — specific situations or combinations of conditions that can lead to hazardous behavior of the intended functionality.

list_alt SOTIF Process Areas

  • Specification and design of the intended functionality
  • Identification of potentially hazardous behavior
  • Analysis of triggering conditions and functional insufficiencies
  • Evaluation of known and unknown hazardous scenarios
  • Definition and implementation of improvement measures
  • Verification and validation strategy for SOTIF
  • Criteria for demonstration of acceptable residual risk
  • Operational phase monitoring and field data collection

Who Needs to Comply?

groups

Automotive OEMs and suppliers developing advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS) and automated driving systems. Particularly critical for SAE Level 2+ through Level 4 systems where perception, decision-making, and actuation must function safely under all foreseeable conditions.

Key Requirements

1

Functional Insufficiency Identification

Systematically identify functional insufficiencies in the specification and design of the intended functionality, including sensor limitations, algorithm performance boundaries, and actuator constraints.

2

Triggering Condition Analysis

Identify and analyze triggering conditions — specific environmental situations, user behaviors, or input combinations that could cause the system to exhibit hazardous behavior despite operating as designed.

3

Scenario Classification & Evaluation

Classify scenarios into four areas: known safe, known hazardous, unknown safe, and unknown hazardous. Systematically reduce the unknown and known hazardous areas to achieve acceptable residual risk.

4

Verification & Validation Strategy

Define a comprehensive V&V strategy combining simulation, test track, and real-world driving to demonstrate that residual risk from SOTIF-related hazards is sufficiently low across all relevant scenarios.

5

SOTIF-Related Monitoring

Implement field monitoring and data collection to identify previously unknown triggering conditions during operation, and feed findings back into the SOTIF improvement process.

Penalties & Enforcement

warning

No direct regulatory penalties — ISO 21448 is a voluntary standard. However, SOTIF analysis is increasingly expected by type approval authorities and is referenced in UNECE regulatory frameworks. Failure to address SOTIF can lead to recalls, liability claims, and reputational damage if automated systems cause incidents due to functional insufficiencies.

官方文档

查看全部

实施时间线

description
2019年1月
ISO/PAS 21448:2019 published as a Publicly Available Specification, introducing the SOTIF concept
check_circle
2022年6月
Full international standard ISO 21448:2022 published, replacing the PAS with expanded scope and requirements
trending_up
2023年
Increasing adoption by OEMs as ADAS and automated driving systems reach higher automation levels
gavel
2024年
UNECE frameworks begin referencing SOTIF principles for type approval of automated driving systems
update
2025年
Revision discussions begin to address AI/ML-based perception systems and Level 4 autonomy challenges

相关分类