HACCP
Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Points
Standard Introduction
HACCP is an active standard published by Codex Alimentarius Commission (FAO/WHO). It is commonly used across Food & Beverage, Manufacturing and applies in Global.
Use this page to review the official documentation, current status, and the certification or assessment bodies most commonly associated with HACCP.
Seven Principles
A systematic framework based on seven principles: hazard analysis, CCP identification, critical limits, monitoring, corrective actions, verification, and record-keeping — applied from raw materials to finished products.
Legally Mandated
Unlike many food safety standards, HACCP is legally required in the US for seafood, juice, and meat/poultry processors. The EU also mandates HACCP-based procedures under Regulation (EC) No 852/2004.
Preventive Approach
Focuses on preventing food safety hazards rather than detecting them in finished products — addressing biological, chemical, and physical hazards at critical control points in the production process.
list_alt The Seven HACCP Principles
- Principle 1: Conduct a hazard analysis
- Principle 2: Determine critical control points (CCPs)
- Principle 3: Establish critical limits for each CCP
- Principle 4: Establish monitoring procedures
- Principle 5: Establish corrective actions
- Principle 6: Establish verification procedures
- Principle 7: Establish record-keeping and documentation
Who Needs to Comply?
Food manufacturers, processors, and handlers — including seafood, meat, poultry, and juice processors (legally mandatory in the US), as well as any food business seeking to systematically manage food safety risks. Required by regulation in the US, EU, and many other jurisdictions.
Key Requirements
Hazard Analysis
Identify and evaluate all potential biological, chemical, and physical hazards associated with each step of the food production process — from raw material receipt through processing, storage, and distribution.
Critical Control Points
Determine the points, steps, or procedures in the process where control can be applied to prevent, eliminate, or reduce food safety hazards to acceptable levels. Use decision trees to systematically identify CCPs.
Critical Limits & Monitoring
Establish scientifically-based critical limits (e.g., temperature, time, pH) for each CCP. Implement monitoring procedures with defined frequency and responsibility to ensure critical limits are consistently met.
Corrective Actions & Verification
Define specific corrective actions when monitoring indicates a CCP deviation. Establish verification activities including CCP validation, record review, and periodic reassessment of the HACCP plan.
Documentation & Records
Maintain comprehensive records including the HACCP plan, hazard analysis, CCP monitoring logs, corrective action records, and verification activities. Records must be available for regulatory inspection.
Implementation Roadmap
Prepare scope, leadership and objectives
Define the hazard analysis and critical control point food safety system scope across raw materials, process steps, equipment, facilities, personnel, distribution, and intended consumers. Confirm leadership accountability, interested parties, legal and contractual obligations, policy commitments, and measurable objectives before detailed control work begins.
Gap analysis and risk assessment
Assess current practices against HACCP requirements and the organization's risk context. Review hazard analysis, critical control points, critical limits, monitoring, corrective actions, verification, and records, then prioritize gaps by compliance exposure, customer impact, operational risk, and audit readiness.
Implement processes, controls and records
Deploy or improve the required processes, operating controls, responsibilities, training, monitoring, documented information, and corrective-action workflows. Build evidence around hazard analyses, CCP decisions, critical limits, monitoring logs, corrective action records, verification results, calibration records, and plan reviews.
Audit, review and continually improve
Run internal audits, management reviews, performance monitoring, and corrective actions before the food safety audit or regulatory review. Keep the system current after incidents, process changes, customer feedback, regulatory changes, or audit findings.
Compliance Checklist
checklist Scope and governance
checklist Operational controls and evidence
checklist Performance and improvement
Penalties & Enforcement
As HACCP is legally mandated for certain food categories, non-compliance can result in FDA warning letters, injunctions, product seizures, and facility shutdowns. Criminal penalties for food safety violations can include fines and imprisonment. In the EU, failure to implement HACCP-based procedures can result in enforcement action by national food safety authorities.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who needs HACCP?
expand_more
HACCP is relevant for organizations that need a disciplined hazard analysis and critical control point food safety system covering raw materials, process steps, equipment, facilities, personnel, distribution, and intended consumers. It is often adopted because customers, regulators, procurement teams, or market expectations require demonstrable controls and repeatable performance.
Is HACCP certifiable or auditable?
expand_more
Yes, organizations can normally pursue a food safety audit or regulatory review against HACCP where certification or accreditation infrastructure exists. Even when certification is not the immediate goal, the standard can be used as an internal operating and assurance framework.
How long does implementation take?
expand_more
A focused implementation often takes several months, depending on scope, maturity, number of sites, process complexity, and evidence quality. Organizations with mature processes can move faster, while multi-site or regulated environments usually need more time.
What is the most important first step?
expand_more
Start with clear scope, leadership accountability, and an honest gap assessment. Without a stable scope and process ownership, teams usually create documents that do not match how work is actually performed.
What evidence do auditors expect?
expand_more
Auditors look for operating evidence, not just policy documents. Useful evidence includes hazard analyses, CCP decisions, critical limits, monitoring logs, corrective action records, verification results, calibration records, and plan reviews, plus proof that findings are reviewed and improved over time.
How often are internal audits needed?
expand_more
Internal audits should be performed at planned intervals based on risk, process importance, prior findings, and changes. Many organizations audit the full system annually and use targeted audits after incidents or major changes.
How does continual improvement work?
expand_more
Continual improvement uses performance data, audit findings, incidents, customer feedback, management review decisions, and corrective actions to strengthen the system. Improvement should be visible in objectives, controls, and measurable outcomes.
Can it be integrated with other standards?
expand_more
Yes. HACCP can usually be integrated with other management-system standards by sharing governance, document control, internal audit, corrective action, risk management, and management review processes.
Official Documentation
Official PDF for HACCP
Official publication or summary for HACCP
Official online resource
Codex Alimentarius Commission (FAO/WHO) guidance and reference material
Implementation toolkit
Templates, guidance, or companion resources for HACCP