verified_user
Standardful
Homechevron_rightStandardschevron_rightCalifornia SB 253
ActiveInternational Standardupdate Standard Updated: February 2026fact_check Fact checked: Jun 28, 2026

California SB 253

Climate Corporate Data Accountability Act — SB 253 (Chapter 382, Statutes of 2023; Health & Safety Code §38532), as amended by SB 219

apartmentPublishing Organization:State of California

Standard Introduction

California SB 253 is an active standard published by State of California. It is commonly used across Finance & Banking, Technology, Manufacturing, Retail, Energy, Services and applies in United States.

Use this page to review the official documentation, current status, and the certification or assessment bodies most commonly associated with California SB 253.

Implementation Roadmap

1
Phase 1schedule Duration: 3-6 weeks

Define California corporate greenhouse-gas disclosure scope

Identify the products, services, systems, entities, jurisdictions, teams, vendors, data flows, and stakeholders covered by California SB 253. Confirm owners, boundaries, applicable obligations, documentation, and evidence expectations for reporting entity status, California business activity, revenue threshold, scope 1, scope 2, scope 3, GHG Protocol alignment, prior fiscal year reporting, assurance, digital reporting, data governance, and CARB implementation rules.

2
Phase 2schedule Duration: 4-10 weeks

Assess obligations and gaps

Compare current practices with the expected California corporate greenhouse-gas disclosure approach. Review entity scoping, revenue assessment, emissions boundary setting, activity data collection, emission factor governance, supplier data collection, scope 2 instrument tracking, scope 3 methodology, assurance readiness, management review, and CARB rule monitoring, then prioritize gaps by legal exposure, user or safety impact, customer commitments, operational dependency, reporting deadlines, and assurance readiness.

3
Phase 3schedule Duration: 8-24 weeks

Implement controls and evidence

Deploy required procedures, technical controls, review gates, training, supplier workflows, reporting paths, and operational records. Maintain entity scoping memos, revenue records, GHG inventories, activity data, emission factors, supplier data, scope 2 instruments, scope 3 calculations, methodology notes, assurance files, management approvals, and CARB submission records as traceable evidence.

4
Phase 4schedule Duration: Ongoing

Review, report, and improve

Run management reviews, internal checks, technical testing or independent assessments where applicable, corrective actions, and change reviews. Refresh the program when products, vendors, laws, incidents, reporting cycles, or stakeholder expectations change.

Compliance Checklist

0 / 12

checklist Scope and accountability

checklist Controls and records

checklist Monitoring and assurance

Frequently Asked Questions

Who needs California SB 253?

expand_more

California SB 253 is most relevant to large public and private U.S. business entities doing business in California with annual revenues over the statutory threshold. The exact scope depends on products, services, jurisdictions, reporting duties, customer commitments, technical requirements, and the organization's role in the relevant ecosystem.

Is California SB 253 certifiable?

expand_more

SB 253 is a California climate disclosure law implemented by CARB, not a certification. Reporting entities must prepare annual scope 1, 2, and 3 GHG disclosures with assurance requirements as phased by regulation.

What should implementation focus on first?

expand_more

Start by defining scope, obligations, accountable owners, and the evidence expected by regulators, customers, auditors, assurance providers, or governance bodies. Then perform a gap assessment against current controls and prioritize remediation by risk and deadline.

What evidence is useful for California SB 253?

expand_more

Useful evidence includes entity scoping memos, revenue records, GHG inventories, activity data, emission factors, supplier data, scope 2 instruments, scope 3 calculations, methodology notes, assurance files, management approvals, and CARB submission records. Evidence should be version-controlled, attributable to owners, linked to obligations and controls, and retained for the required review or audit period.

How often should the program be reviewed?

expand_more

Review it at planned intervals and whenever laws, products, vendors, incidents, reporting cycles, customer commitments, technical standards, or assurance expectations change. Higher-risk obligations should have more frequent monitoring and management reporting.

Official Documentation

View All

Related Categories