verified_user
Standardful
Homechevron_rightStandardschevron_rightAPPI
ActiveInternational Standardupdate Standard Updated: April 2022fact_check Fact checked: Jun 28, 2026

APPI

Act on the Protection of Personal Information — 個人情報の保護に関する法律

apartmentPublishing Organization:Personal Information Protection Commission Japan (PPC)

Standard Introduction

APPI is an active standard published by Personal Information Protection Commission Japan (PPC). It is commonly used across Technology, Finance & Banking, Retail, Healthcare, Services and applies in Asia Pacific, Japan.

Use this page to review the official documentation, current status, and the certification or assessment bodies most commonly associated with APPI.

Implementation Roadmap

1
Phase 1schedule Duration: 3-6 weeks

Define Japan personal information protection scope

Identify the products, services, systems, entities, jurisdictions, teams, vendors, and stakeholders covered by APPI. Confirm owners, boundaries, applicable obligations, documentation, and evidence expectations for personal information, personal data, retained personal data, sensitive personal information, purpose specification, consent, disclosure, third-party transfer, cross-border transfer, safety controls, individual rights, and breach reporting.

2
Phase 2schedule Duration: 4-10 weeks

Assess obligations and gaps

Compare current practices with the expected Japan personal information protection approach. Review purpose notices, lawful handling rules, consent capture, safety management measures, processor supervision, third-party transfer records, cross-border disclosures, individual request workflows, incident assessment, and PPC notification, then prioritize gaps by legal exposure, financial reporting impact, security or privacy impact, customer commitments, operational dependency, and audit readiness.

3
Phase 3schedule Duration: 8-24 weeks

Implement controls and evidence

Deploy required procedures, technical controls, review gates, training, supplier workflows, reporting paths, and operational records. Maintain data maps, purpose notices, consent records, safety-control procedures, vendor agreements, transfer records, request logs, breach assessments, PPC communications, training records, and internal audit evidence as traceable evidence.

4
Phase 4schedule Duration: Ongoing

Review, report, and improve

Run management reviews, internal checks, independent assessments where applicable, corrective actions, and change reviews. Refresh the program when products, vendors, laws, incidents, assurance expectations, or stakeholder needs change.

Compliance Checklist

0 / 12

checklist Scope and accountability

checklist Controls and records

checklist Monitoring and assurance

Frequently Asked Questions

Who needs APPI?

expand_more

APPI is most relevant to business operators handling personal information in Japan or providing goods and services to individuals in Japan. The exact scope depends on products, services, jurisdictions, customer commitments, assurance requirements, and the organization's role in the relevant ecosystem.

Is APPI certifiable?

expand_more

APPI is a legal privacy regime supervised by Japan's Personal Information Protection Commission, not a certification standard.

What should implementation focus on first?

expand_more

Start by defining scope, obligations, accountable owners, and the evidence expected by regulators, auditors, customers, or governance bodies. Then perform a gap assessment against current controls and prioritize remediation by risk and deadline.

What evidence is useful for APPI?

expand_more

Useful evidence includes data maps, purpose notices, consent records, safety-control procedures, vendor agreements, transfer records, request logs, breach assessments, PPC communications, training records, and internal audit evidence. Evidence should be version-controlled, attributable to owners, linked to obligations and controls, and retained for the required review or audit period.

How often should the program be reviewed?

expand_more

Review it at planned intervals and whenever laws, products, vendors, incidents, customer commitments, reporting cycles, or assurance expectations change. Higher-risk obligations should have more frequent monitoring and management reporting.

Official Documentation

View All

Related Categories